intentional conformity
[editor’s note: the following post may be offensive to hippies, Christians, and people who don’t find South Park funny]
A few weeks ago, I received an invitation to attend an organizational meeting of a new “ecovillage” that’s being developed in Barnstead. I didn’t know what an ecovillage is, or where Barnstead is, but I was intrigued enough to find out more.
The idea behind the ecovillage is that a couple of self-described hippies own a large tract of largely undeveloped land. They’re getting on in years and lack the time and energy to develop it themselves. They’re also demoralized by battling, for years, with the planning nazis of their small town, who have wasted a great deal of their time and money by imposing various arbitrary rules on them as far as what kind of home they can live in on their own property, how many friends they can have living with them, etc. But, as you are probably aware, the national real estate market is in the toilet right now, so they don’t even have the option of selling their property. Their adult children don’t share their passion for permaculture and have no interest in giving up their various careers to live in Barnstead. So the property owners are making a last-ditch effort to meet like-minded individuals willing to join them and try to develop an intentional permaculture community on the property.
I had to look up the word permaculture on wikipedia, as I really didn’t know what it meant. After doing so, I liked what I saw. I particularly liked this quote: “Permaculture design principles extend from the position that “The only ethical decision is to take responsibility for our own existence and that of our children” (Mollison, 1990).” Although I was pretty turned off of modern American environmentalism as practiced by mainstream government-funded-and/or-colluding nonprofit organizations, based on my experiences working for the Sierra Club and a nonprofit recycling company, I still believe in the fundamental concepts. Resource conservation makes sense. I like fuzzy woodland creatures. I’ve been known to climb a tree (OK, mostly I just *think* about climbing trees…). I’ve also been giving a lot of thought to what kind of house, if any, I’d like to own. The truth is, a 1-BR apartment holds me, my cats, and everything else I own pretty nicely, and I am beyond lazy when it comes to things like housecleaning and handyman tasks. The thought of me owning a 3+-BR house seems like a recipe for disaster, unless I firmly commit to paying other people to maintain it for me. So the idea of developing a community based on the principles of resource and energy conservation, possibly featuring tiny houses, appeals to me. I also like the idea of having privacy within my own modest home, while still having the option of hobnobbing with other freedom-loving individuals who live within walking distance. Plus, the ability to just pack your house on a trailer and relocate it as necessary has definite appeal in these increasingly fascistic times.
I missed the first ecovillage organizational meeting due to illness. I did make it to the second, but showed up late on account of having to rush from the monthly LPNH meeting. By the time I got there, everyone else had disappeared into the woods for a tour of the property. One woman who had stayed behind told me which direction to head into the woods, and said “When you get to the yellow schoolbus, just keep going.” Ah yes… I was definitely in Hippie Country.
Perhaps I should mention that I spent many years in the socialist triangle of Berkeley/Oakland/San Francisco California. I attended college at Cal Berkeley, spending the first two years living one block up from People’s Park. I know hippies. And, [Cartman mode]GODDAMMIT!!![/Cartman mode] I don’t like ‘em.
Now, don’t get me wrong: I occasionally burn incense. I saw the Dead… twice! (Granted, I fell asleep during one of the shows.) I am most definitely anti-war. I can even tolerate the scent of patchouli.
But many other aspects of hippiedom make my stomach churn. I’ve got nothing against peace, love and happiness per se, but for Christ’s sake, would you get a JOB?! Take a SHOWER?! Plan for your own FUTURE, not to mention that of your children and those two mangy dogs you’ve got living under the overpass with you?! Unconditional love, IMHO, should be limited to pets and babies. Everyone else needs to *earn* love by being a decent, pleasant, productive human being. Obviously, if Jesus “Love Thy Neighbor” Christ and I had to go mano a mano, Jesus would kick my weenie ass in the fans-of-his-philosophy department, but I don’t care. I’m right, [Cartman mode]GODDAMMIT!!![/Cartman mode], and Jesus was just the first of the hippies, mooching free food and crash space off other people with, you know… jobs.
Where the hell was I?? Oh yeah, Barnstead. So, I caught up with the others, but was surprised to discover that, although all the snow had melted down where I live on the southern border of the state, there was still at least a foot of it up there in the woods. Fortunately, Doc Martens are fairly waterproof. We had a nice tour of the property, which is beautiful. We saw an owl head (yes, just the head), which was an odd David Lynchian touch. The owner of the property, who seems like a very nice old guy, told us his history with the property and what his vision for it is. Then we adjourned to a cabin on the property to continue the discussions.
Now, despite the fact that Barnstead is a bit beyond commute distance from my job, and my aforementioned aversion to hippies, I was trying really hard to keep an open mind and to see if I might be able to work with these people. Unfortunately, the owner lost me when he started discussing the mandatory ground-rules that would have to be applied to all who chose to pay to come live on his property. They included the following:
* no alcohol (granted, I don’t drink, but I have friends and relatives who do)
* no drugs (no mention was made of allowance for people who smoke marijuana for medicinal purposes)
* no firearms (I guess intruders will be kept off by the smell of patchouli?)
* no harsh language, because that is violence
* no walking your dog in the woods; it might disturb the wild creatures
Now I’m sorry, but this, to me, does not sound like a recipe for “freedom”. Some of these rules were to be imposed as a form of self-defense against the local police, who would apparently be looking for any excuse to shut the whole thing down. I fully understand that, and would probably be equally eager to protect my assets, liability-wise, if I were the one who owned the property. But still, if I can’t get hammered and scream obscenities at my significant other within the privacy of my own home, and must rely upon my bad breath to scare off intruders, what’s the point? And what the hell did my (theoretical) dog do to anyone?
6 Comments
, where do I, and this blog, go from here? Fuck if I know. Not quite sure how I’m going to spend my free time now; granted, Molyneux’s verbosity is staggering and I could conceivably spend every night and weekend for the next two years sitting in this chair listening to podcasts. But somehow, I don’t think that’s going to happen. I could go live in a shack in the woods and commune with nature; but then the Starbucks drive-through would be too far away! I hold no pretensions of being Neo or Morpheus or John Galt or any other legendary leader of the anarchists. But maybe, like Frodo the hobbit, I can find just a few stout-hearted comrades and together, we can find a way to destroy the Ring of Power… or at least 