North American Secessionist Convention

On Saturday, Nov. 15, 2008, Manchester New Hampshire played host to the Third Annual North American Secessionist Convention. This event, organized and sponsored each year by the Middlebury Institute, brings together delegates of secessionist groups from throughout North America to exchange ideas, engage in networking, and promote the idea of secession to attendees and the general public. Attendance is free, and delegates are treated to a closing banquet, courtesy of the Middlebury Institute.

The convention was held at the Radisson Hotel in downtown Manchester. The inaugural event took place in Burlington, VT in 2006, and last year’s event was held in Chattanooga, TN. Kirkpatrick Sale, director of the Middlebury Institute and organizer of the annual event, makes a point of referring to it as a *convention*, not a conference, because its attendees are delegates of various organizations, just as the First and Second Constitutional Conventions of what would become the USA were attended by representatives of various states and territories. The Middlebury Institute focuses on the study of separatism, secession and self-determination.

The convention began promptly at 9:00AM with a presentation by Ku Kuakahi, delegate from the Kingdom of Hawaii. The KoH doesn’t seek to secede from the U.S., as the kingdom never voluntarily joined the U.S. in the first place, but rather was forcibly annexed in 1893. The KoH seeks to regain its independence, to be recognized as an independent nation by the global community of nation-states, and to reinstitute its traditional constitutional monarchy.

Kai Landau of the Hawaiian Embassy also spoke about the political situation in Hawaii. The Hawaiian Embassy pursues a strategy of running a shadow government in parallel with the existing U.S. government. It has its own Prime Minister and courts, and members have contested land ownership, attempting to restore land to its rightful owners from prior to annexation. Members have also challenged driver’s license regulations in court.

The next speaker, Larry Kilgore, ran for the U.S. Senate as a Texas Republican on an openly secessionist platform, garnering 19% of the vote in the party primary. This was a significant improvement over a prior run for governor of Texas, also on a secessionist platform, in which Kilgore claimed 9% of the vote. If elected, Kilgore will request permission from the federal government for Texas to peacefully secede from the Union. If the request is refused, Kilgore intends to rely on the international court of public opinion to further his cause; he opposes any use of violence. More information can be found at http://www.texassecession.com/

Keith Humphrey spoke on behalf of the organization Christian Exodus. Originally founded as a plan to encourage Christians to move to the state of South Carolina in order to build up a large enough number to have political clout, the group has since expanded its reach into Idaho and Panama. Approximately 1500 people have signed up so far, and dozens of families have already relocated. C.E. focuses on independence at the family level, promoting personal secession by “getting off the grid”, home-birthing and not registering newborns with the government, local agriculture, home businesses, and alternative currencies. There is no central organization; families that have relocated operate autonomously.

Next on the agenda was Cesidio Tallini, governor of Independent Long Island. ILI is made up of Queens, Nassau, Suffolk and King Counties in New York, as well as a small island in the Pacific. Brooklyn, NY is its capital. Founded in Aug. 2007, the independent nation currently has 16 registered citizens, to which it issues its own passports.

Tom Moore spoke on behalf of both the Southern National Congress and the League of the South. The LoS is a broadbased organization promoting southern independence and publishes its own newspaper, the Free Magnolia. Members of the LoS emphasize self-sufficiency and local food production.

The Southern National Congress, founded in 2004, serves as a forum for all southern states to express their grievances with the federal government; it’s modelled on the 1st and 2nd Continental Congresses. It promotes the concept of withholding consent. The SNC will be holding its first Congressional meeting Dec. 5 - 7, 2008 in Hendersonville, NC. 120 delegates from all thirteen southern states and Maryland are expected to attend. Moore discussed some successful historical precedents for peaceful secession from imperial control, including India, Ireland and Scotland.

The Alaskan Independence Party was represented by Dexter Clark, its Vice-Chair (Clark’s wife, Lynette, is party Chair). Clark issued a formal apology for unwittingly playing a role in the public furor that ensued when inaccurate stories of Republican Vice Presidential candidate Sarah Palin circulated in the recent Presidential campaign. Apparently, Clark had erroneously stated at a previous convention that Sarah Palin had been a member, and his speech was recorded and posted on YouTube. Political hacks then went so far as to create a false website, claiming to represent the AIP, and prominently featuring Sarah Palin on its homepage. Clark wished to set the record straight that Sarah Palin has never been a member of the AIP, although she has addressed the organization and her husband, Todd, was a member for seven years. Convention attendees were shown a recording of a CNN “expose” on the AIP, in which a reporter visited the Clarks at their home in Fairbanks and a political analyst commented on the party’s official platform and public statements. He proclaimed it “radical”, but “legitimate”.

The AIP is a state-level political party that runs candidates for office and promotes the idea of Alaskan independence with a minimal government. In the recent election, some AIP candidates received more than 4% of the vote, thus deciding the outcome of battles between the two major parties.

Thomas Naylor spoke on behalf of several secessionist organizations from the state of Vermont. Naylor has been involved with the Vermont secession movement for five years, and described it as a loose alliance of four separate organizations: the Second Vermont Republic, the Vermont Commons, Free Vermont and the Green Mountain Brigade. While one of the best organized secessionist movements in North America, 2VR has suffered from public attacks, some anonymous, falsely linking it to white supremacist organizations. Naylor refutes any such claims. The Vermont legislature reportedly contains several closet secessionists, but none who are willing to go public yet. 2VR held its second statewide convention earlier this month, in the Vermont State House of all places.

Dennis Steele spoke briefly on behalf of the Green Mountain Brigade. This self-described hardcore Ron Paul supporter is now encouraging Vermont residents to run for office on a secessionist platform. He also encouraged other convention delegates to come together and combine their efforts on behalf of one secessionist movement (namely, Vermont’s), in order to increase its chance of success. Just one success would serve as a catalyst for the rest of the nation.

For the first time, the Parti Quebecois sent a representative to the North American Secessionist Convention. Marcel Sauvais spoke at length about the history of the party, a political movement which developed in conjunction with a cultural rejection of Catholicism. Although the province of Quebec, with a population of 7.5 million and a land area equivalent to Scandinavia, was dominated by the Catholic Church throughout much of its history, the Parti Quebecois is a strictly secular movement. The party held its first referendum for independence in 1980, which failed in part due to the difficulty at that time of spreading countercultural and anti-federal government ideas. A second attempt in 1995 failed very narrowly; Sauvais believes there was vote fraud and that the legitimate result was that a majority of Quebecois voted to secede from Canada.

Robert Pritchard represented the Republic of Texas. Pritchard seeks to regain independence for the original Republic of Texas, whose territory included parts of what is now Oklahoma. The RoT promotes the use of cantons, as exist in Switzerland today, as well as a “virtual country” approach. There is no reason why government should have a territorial monopoly; residents should be free to choose among multiple governments. The RoT currently claims “a couple handful” of citizens.

Carolyn Chute spoke informally on behalf of the Second Maine Militia (not to be confused with the Maine Militia, a different organization), a loosely organized non-partisan group of pro-gun, anti-big business citizens. Chute, the author of several books, believes that politics grows out of culture. Maine has a unique culture that provides networking opportunities between different interest groups. There’s a very strong food sovereignty movement in the state.

The Free State Project was on the agenda (according to Mr. Sale, three participants had RSVP’ed to represent the organization), but none of those three were in attendance. As the FSP is a New Hampshire movement, there were several other participants in attendance (full disclosure: this reporter is also an FSP participant); Mr. Sale asked if any of them would like to say a few words on behalf of the organization. A man identifying himself only as “William” quickly accepted the offer. William talked about how the FSP is an effort to get 20,000 pro-liberty activists to move to New Hampshire, where they will exert the fullest practical effort toward the creation of a society in which the maximum role of government is the protection of life, liberty and property. According to the organization’s website, it currently has almost 9000 participants signed up, with over 600 already in New Hampshire. William discussed the diversity of strategies used by FSP participants, some working within the electoral system while others pursuing alternate avenues such as civil disobedience. In the recent election, several FSP participants were elected to the New Hampshire state house.

The last delegate of the day was Sebastian Ronin, speaking on behalf of the Novacadia Alliance, which is comprised of the Canadian Maritime Provinces (Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island) as well as the U.S. states of Maine, New Hampshire and Vermont. (Newfoundland is excluded.) Ronin is the former Executive Director of the BC Green Party and now resides in Nova Scotia. He believes that global industrial civilization is rapidly headed towards collapse due to Peak Oil, and that freedom-minded people should prepare themselves for massive cultural changes. The territory of Novacadia currently has a population of 5 million; its three largest cities are Halifax, Manchester and St. John. The Novacadia Independence Party is a brand-new political party that allows citizens of both Canada and the U.S. to join.

The second half of the one-day convention featured a workshop led by Dexter Clark, which presented specific tactics to use to promote the idea of secession. A last-minute addition to the agenda was a presentation by Robert Steele, a self-described “moderate Republican” with strong opinions but no apparent association with any secessionist organizations.

The convention wrapped up with a discussion of a joint resolution to be signed and issued by the delegates of the organizations in attendance. The end result, The Manchester Declaration can be viewed on the Middlebury Institute’s website.

mock the vote

It’s primary day in New Hampshire. In towns all over the state, starry-eyed Free State Project early movers are standing at polling places (and from the looks of the sky, will soon be standing in a thundershower), holding signs, bright smiles plastered firmly to their faces, asking that their fellow New Hampshire residents choose THEM (or one of their friends) to be their elected representatives instead of those other guys who want to be their elected representatives. With very few exceptions, they’re all running as Republicans. Because, as we all know, the Republican Party stands for limited government. ;-)

What’s wrong with this picture?

I’m reminded of the excellent, if controversial, cartoon entitled No More Kings by the talented anarchist comic Dale Everett, creator of Anarchy In Your Head. A play on the popular Tolkien Lord of the Rings series, it shows Ron Paul holding out his hand, stating “Give me the ring, Frodo! With its power, I can lead the forces of liberty to victory.” I believe Everett’s goal was not to put down Ron Paul or his legions of fans; by all indications, if there is an incorruptible human being in American politics today, he’s the one. It was to show that the way to dismantle a corrupt and immoral system is not to attempt to put yourself in charge of it, confident that you will run it ever so much better than your neighbor (who, of course, is thinking the exact same thing).

Meanwhile, many hard-working political activists were shocked (SHOCKED!) when the Manchester Board of Aldermen used legal chicanery to refuse to put the spending cap for which they’d worked so hard gathering petition signatures on the November ballot. See the ridleo here.

Open your eyes. Freedom doesn’t come from an elected official (even if that elected official is your friend). It doesn’t come from a political party. It doesn’t come from any of the options printed on your ballot. It certainly doesn’t come from any piece of paper detailing the specifics of how a group of strangers can dispose of your property without your permission.

Thoreau had it right 150 years ago. “There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking at the root.”

this june 5th

PUBLIC NOTICE

State of Emergency

10 Day National Bank Holiday Declared

Starting on June 5, 2008 and lasting through June 15, 2008 all US Citizens, Americans, Foreign Nationals, and Resident Aliens are hereby requested by the authority of We The People of the United States to withdraw all Federal Reserve Bank Notes (U.S. Dollars) from their personal bank for a term no less than ten (10) days. This includes all checking, savings, CDs etc.

Due to the reckless policies of the central bank of the United States, the Federal Reserve, its Chairman and Board of Governors a financial state of emergency exists. Billions of dollars of financial relief afforded to Wall St. because of the sub-prime mortgage market meltdown and the “economic stimulus package” for the American Taxpayer has resulted in hyper-accelerated inflation causing record price indexes for gas, food, energy and the cost of living.

This 10 day bank holiday is designed to strengthen the buying power of the U.S. Dollar by limiting the amount in circulation, therefore reducing inflation. Withdrawing funds reduces their reserves and minimalizes the amount of money the banks can lend, reducing the impact of inflation therefore lowering prices. Please note: Banks can loan out their holdings by a factor of 9. When new funds are deposited, the banks can loan out 9 times the actual deposit.

Americans participating in this national 10 day bank holiday are encouraged, not required, to withhold their federal reserve debt notes (U.S. dollars) outside of banking institutions for as long as possible.

This 10 day bank holiday is also intended to strike the source of the problem by demanding the repealing of the “Federal Reserve Act of 1913″, and likewise demand “lawful money” backed by gold or silver printed by the U.S. Treasury to replace the fiat currency backed by debt printed by the Federal Reserve.

Please note: Banks have limits on cash withdrawals per day to prevent rapid depletion of their cash reserves, stagger withdrawals to achieve desired balances.

Also note: In cases where minimum balances must be maintained individuals must decide to either close their account or maintain the minimum balance to avoid penalties.

This June 5th marks the 75th anniversary of the United States going off the gold standard.
This June 15th marks the 172nd anniversary of the repealing of the charter of the “Bank of the United States” by the 24th Congress.

This 10 day bank holiday is so declared by the authority of
We The People of the United States.

The Free State Observer pledges to participate. Will you?
this june 5th

terrorist watch list

According to the American Civil Liberties Union, the U.S. Federal Government’s terrorist watch list is now approaching a million “winners”. The ACLU has a clever graphic demonstrating the rate at which this list is growing: you can watch the number grow in real-time: http://www.aclu.org/privacy/spying/watchlistcounter.html

Assuming that only adults are on this list (a very big assumption when dealing with the Feds, admittedly), and adding this figure to those in my last post, and assuming I still remember how to do algebraic equations (a very big assumption when dealing with my sodden brain, admittedly) this works out to 1 in 71.4 American adults who are either locked up or being watched.

Sing with me now: I’m proud to be an Amuricaaaaaaaan…

who is john galt?

According to a recent New York Times article, 1 in 100 U.S. adults are now behind bars:http://tinyurl.com/2oxar8

I’m having trouble wrapping my mind around these statistics. Seriously.

  • 1 in every 99.1 adults in the U.S. is currently behind bars
  • 1 in 36 Hispanic adults
  • 1 in 15 black adults
  • 1 in 9 black men between the ages of 20 and 34

I’ve been meaning to reread “1984″; it’s been many years. But IIRC, it seems like the current reality of the U.S. may actually be worse than Orwell envisioned. This is actually worse than all sorts of sci fi dystopian books/movies I’ve read/seen over the years.

1 in 100? Huh?

I’m currently re-reading Atlas Shrugged, and these statistics just bring into sharper focus the fact that an ever-shrinking number of us (including myself in this “us”) are supporting a shocking chunk of the rest of the population. We really are carrying the world on our backs.

But for how long?

all eyes turn to new hampshire

Applaud friends, the comedy is over. — Beethoven, on his deathbed

I called it four months ago. Ayup.

I’m going to go out on a limb here and say that Ron Paul isn’t even going to win the Republican nomination in the state of New Hampshire. In case y’all haven’t been paying attention, the demographics and politics of this state have changed since Pat Buchanan (ugh) won the state nomination. Go ahead and smite the shit out of me for daring to desecrate the name of Ron Paul. Roll Eyes And if he does manage to get the NH nomination, I will publicly eat my hat. In fact, I will bring an enormous cake, in the shape of a hat, from Frederick’s Pastries, to an MVP meeting, and we can ALL eat my hat. Grin
http://newhampshireunderground.com/forum/index.php?topic=10575.msg181968#msg181968

So what happens now? Will Ron Paul seek the Libertarian Party nomination? Will he run as an independent? Will he go down in the muck of today’s New Republic splatterfest? And what will become of the Ron Paul Revolution? Things could get pretty interesting around here….. (yes, that’s YASR (Yet Another Serenity Reference))

restoration caucus seeks return to 2004 LP platform

Restoration Caucus Seeks Return to 2004 Platform

A group of Libertarian Party members who believe that the Party’s 2004 Platform better represents the libertarian vision than does the truncated version adopted in 2006 have formed the Restoration Caucus, and will work to restore the earlier version at the upcoming LP convention in Denver next May. Their first step will be to petition the members of the 2008 Platform Committee to adopt the 2004 Platform as the starting point for their deliberations, rather than trying to create a new platform based on the butchered 2006 version.

According to the Restoration Caucus website www.restore04.com - the founding members of the Caucus believe that the wisest and most effective course the 2008 Platform Committee can take will be to restore the 2004 Platform, which evolved over three decades and includes contributions from many of our Party’s greatest thinkers. Any attempt to thoughtfully and carefully address each of the issues we need to address, starting from scratch, will be laborious and contentious. And a hastily conceived document is likely to be rejected in its entirety by the delegates in Denver.

The 2004 Platform offers a time-tested basis for future platforms. Clearly, there will need to be changes, and the 2008 Platform Committee must address them on a plank-by-plank basis. But the obvious first step they should take is to revert to the 2004 Platform as a starting point.

Early signers of the petition to restore the 2004 platform include David F. Nolan (a founder of the Libertarian Party), David Bergland (former VP and Presidential candidate, and former National Chair), 2008 Presidential hopeful Steve Kubby, current LNC member Angela Keaton, and former California LP Chairs Ted Brown and Mark Hinkle.

In urging their fellow Libertarians to support the Restore 04 drive, the petition’s signers note that the 2006 platform was adopted at the smallest national convention since 1973, which was less than half the size of the 2004 convention in Atlanta. They also state that “We do not see this proposal as being either ‘radical’ or ‘reformist’. It is simply an attempt to restore our party’s long-standing stance on the key issues facing America.”

LP members who would like to support the Restoration Caucus can sign the petition at www.restore04.com

v for vendetta

Good evening, New Hampshire.

Allow me first to apologize for this interruption. I do, like many of you, appreciate the comforts of the everyday routine, the security of the familiar, the tranquility of repetition. I enjoy them as much as any bloke. But in the spirit of commemoration whereby those important events of the past, usually associated with someone’s death or the end of some awful, bloody struggle, a celebration with a nice holiday, I thought we could take some time out of our daily lives to sit down and have a little chat. There are of course those who do not want us to speak. I expect even now orders are being shouted into telephones and men with guns will soon be on their way. Why? Because while the truncheon may be used in lieu of conversation, words will always retain their power. Words offer the means to meaning, and for those who will listen, the enunciation of truth. And the truth is, there is something terribly wrong with this country, isn’t there? Cruelty and injustice, intolerance and oppression, and where once you had the freedom to object, to think and speak as you saw fit, you now have censors and systems of surveillance coercing your conformity and soliciting your submission. How did this happen? Who’s to blame? Well certainly there are those who are more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable. But again, truth be told, if you’re looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror. I know why you did it. I know you were afraid! Who wouldn’t be? War, terror, disease, there were a myriad of problems which conspired to induce us to silently acquiesce as our elected representatives moved swiftly to expand their power in grossly unconstitutional ways in the immediate aftermath of Sept. 11, 2001. The 11th of September burns forever in our memory, but the 26th of October, the day the USA PATRIOT Act was signed into law, is sadly forgotten. It is left to us to remind the world that fairness, justice and freedom are more than words… they are perspectives. So if you’ve seen nothing, if the crimes of this government remain unknown to you, then I would suggest that you allow the 26th of October to pass unmarked. But if you see what I see, if you feel as I feel, and if you would seek as I seek, then I ask you to stand beside me two months from today, at noon, on the steps of the New Hampshire state capitol, and together we shall give them a 26th of October that shall never, ever be forgot.

Next Page »