a fable, part 2

[note: this is the second half of a post entitled "a fable" ]

For quite some time, Jo sailed his boat alone on Lake Rika, trying to sort through the thoughts in his head and feeling increasingly frustrated and confused.  Finally, he decided to seek advice from a wise man who was rumored to live on a small island on the lake.  Jo anchored his boat off the edge of the island, swam ashore, and began hiking around searching for the legendary wise man.  As usually happens, the wise man turned out to be in the last place he looked.  The wise man was very old and thin, and wore nothing but a worn old deerskin which barely covered enough of him to be considered socially appropriate back in the village.  Clearly, the wise man wasn’t concerned with such things.  Although Jo didn’t have an invitation, the wise man greeted him warmly and seemed to have no problem with a strange villager showing up on his doorstep seeking advice.

Jo launched into a lengthy monologue about all he had been thinking about: that Sammy was not great and benevolent; that it wasn’t right to let a lake monster eat your children; that it wasn’t fair that some people were forced to feed the monster while others fed themselves out of the lake monster supplies; that it didn’t seem to make much of a difference whom exactly was on the Council of Elders at any given time.  He asked the wise man to explain a way out of this mess.  What was a simple fisherman to do?

The wise man, who had been smoking a pipe while Jo ranted, sat silently for some time.  Finally, he responded with a question:  Where do lake monsters come from?

Jo was baffled.  What did he mean, where do lake monsters come from?  They come from lakes, obviously!

“If lake monsters come from lakes, how did they survive before villagers began feeding them?”,  he asked.

Jo thought about this for a moment.  He really wasn’t sure.  Were there even any lake monsters before there were villagers?  Could Sammy have ever grown so large and powerful if not for generations of villagers tending to his diet?  This sort of chicken-and-egg question was interesting, but somewhat beside the point.  The fact is, there ARE lake monsters, and he wanted to know what to do about it.

“Alright, let me ask you another question.  How do you destroy a lake monster?”, the wise man queried.

“That’s easy!”, Jo said triumphantly. “Stop feeding it!”

“Ah!” responded the wise man.

Jo waited a moment, expecting more of a response.  But none came.  “But, of course, it’s not enough just for *me* to stop feeding the lake monster.  A number of other productive villagers need to do so as well.”

“Indeed”, mused the wise man.

Jo was getting a bit annoyed with this.  “So…… how do I convince the other villagers to stop feeding Sammy?”

“Who convinced you to stop feeding him?” responded the wise man.

Jo opened his mouth to respond, then paused.  “Well, no one, exactly. I just sort of… you know… figured it out myself. After reading several books by radical village philosophers, listening to podcasts while repairing my nets, and talking with people down at the pub.”

“Well, there you go.”  smiled the wise man.

Jo was definitely annoyed now.  “What do you mean, there you go?!  Are you saying I can’t teach anyone anything, they can only teach themselves?”

“I didn’t say anything”, said the wise man.

“That’s not an answer!!” Jo exploded, completely frustrated now.  “I can’t just let my friends and neighbors keep throwing a large portion of their crops into the lake, and watch their children get eaten.  I should be able to convince them to stop!”

“There is no “should”, my young friend.  To quote a wise man (Jo found this slightly amusing.  He wondered if the Wise Man considered himself to be a wise man; if not, did the wise man the Wise Man was about to quote consider himself to be a wise man?  Did anyone actually think of himself as wise, or was the attainment of wisdom to understand that wisdom is actually a path, rather than a destination?  He cut off this line of thinking and drew his focus back to what the Wise Man was saying): “the essence of philosophy is to accept the universe as it is, rather than try to force it into some preconceived shape.”

Jo thought about this for several moments.  Finally he said “So you mean, I can’t teach the other villagers about the true nature of the lake monster? I just have to wait and see if they figure it out for themselves?”

“I didn’t say it”, the Wise Man said again, a small smile twitching the corner of his lips.

“Well, what am I supposed to do in the meantime?” Jo asked. “I mean, other than fishing, gardening, hunting, and trying to avoid both having my fish taken for Sammy and getting thrown in the stockade?”

“When’s the last time you kissed a girl, kid?”

Jo turned beet red.  “Well, I’ve been *busy*…” he stammered.  “Fishing is a time-consuming occupation, you know! The fish don’t just leap into the nets by themselves. ”

“Uh huh” replied the old man.

“So let me see if I’ve got this straight.  What you’re basically saying is that I should just focus on being the best fisherman I can be, don’t feed lake monsters, try not to get thrown in the stockade, and find a nice girl to spend time with, hopefully one who shares my anti-lake monster sentiments?”

“That sounds like an excellent plan!” smiled the Wise Man.

Jo had a feeling that this conversation had not gone quite according to plan.  Or rather, that he seemed to now have a plan, but wasn’t quite sure where it had come from.  Oh well, this was making his head hurt.  The old man was clearly wise, and had given him a not unpleasant plan; actually, it was pretty much exactly what he would have done if there had never been a lake monster in the first place.  He swam back to his boat, hauled up the anchor, and set sail for the village.   He’d continue to hone his fishing skills, work on his garden, put away as much as he could in preparation for the dreaded “Peak Fish” scenario, and share his anti-lake monster books and podcasts with any acquaintance who seemed willing to give them a listen.  Also,  there was that cute girl he had seen at the pub, but never actually got up the nerve to speak to before.  Carpe draco pen! (This was an old villager expression that translated to “Seize the lake monster by the tail.”)

first, do no harm

Primum non nocere is a Latin phrase that means “First, do no harm.” The phrase is sometimes recorded as primum nil nocere.

Nonmaleficence, which derives from the maxim, is one of the principal precepts that all medical students are taught in medical school and is a fundamental principle for emergency medical services around the world. Another way to state it is that “given an existing problem, it may be better to do nothing than to do something that risks causing more harm than good.” It reminds the physician and other health care providers that they must consider the possible harm that any intervention might do. It is invoked when debating the use of an intervention that carries an obvious risk of harm but a less certain chance of benefit. Since at least 1860, the phrase has been for physicians a hallowed expression of hope, intention, humility, and recognition that human acts with good intentions may have unwanted consequences. A closely related phrase is “Sometimes the cure is worse than the ill.” source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primum_non_nocere

A common statement made when liberty activists are arguing with one another about the best way to proceed is “At least we’re/they’re/he’s doing something.” I don’t know where this idea came from, but it sure makes me want to smack people upside the head sometimes, in hopes that some common sense will be jarred loose from whichever internal part of their brain it’s currently trapped. There are plenty of life scenarios where doing something is not necessarily better than doing nothing. If you’re overweight and out-of-shape, going out and running five miles is not better than staying on the couch, if those five miles trigger a heart attack in your shocked and unprepared body. If you’re in Vegas with your life savings in cash in your wallet, betting it all at the blackjack table isn’t necessarily safe, wise or better than doing nothing with it.

Now granted, we’re all operating with unknowns. Inside-the-system activists (which I will abbreviate as ITS) have never actually succeeded in getting someone like Ron Paul elected to the Presidency (or a governorship… or a Senate seat… or even a Congressional district outside of Bumfuck, TX). If something miraculous happened and this occurred tomorrow, there would undoubtedly be unexpected hurdles and side effects prior to achieving the presumed goal of making our society freer (like, oh, say, the President still has to deal with CONGRESS). Outside-the-system activists (which I will abbreviate as OTS) have never (talking about the last 50 years in the U.S. here, not the whole history of history) actually succeeded in making a state or a town free of the coercive grasp of government. I could write a whole science fiction novella about the possible ramifications of the abrupt removal of coercive government from a community unprepared and ill-equipped to handle that, but I’ll save myself some time and just refer you back to the news coverage of the aftermath of Katrina, where the jackals of human society lost no time feeding off their slower and weaker neighbors.

What’s my point? We’re all operating with imperfect information, and no one truly knows the quickest, best path to creating a free society. (Freeing yourself is a different subject which numerous philosophers, political thinkers and spiritual leaders have addressed elsewhere; for starters, I refer you to the excellent How I Found Freedom In An Unfree World by the late, great Harry Browne ). But to blindly argue that all strategies are equally valid, and doing something is always better than doing nothing, is to willfully turn off the analytical, pattern-recognizing part of your brain that can project likely outcomes from actions not yet taken.

Ben Franklin advised: Do not squander time for that is the stuff life is made of. I see people in both the ITS and OTS groups running around like chickens with their heads cut off, breathlessly doing something and acting self-righteous about it. If you’ve thought about what you’re doing, believe you know what the consequences will be, and you like those consequences, then more power to you. If you’re not sure, or haven’t even begun to think about it, your brain is your friend and wants you to use it.

Another thing: back seat drivers. We all hate them. However, to argue that if someone doesn’t live in New Hampshire, and/or is not engaged in the specific type of activism in which I am engaged, they cannot possibly have anything of value to say to me about what is going on here… I mean, seriously? Are we that full of ourselves? The beauty and power of media (the written word, and more recently, audio and video) is that it enables us to communicate asynchronously with people in other times and places, and to, God forbid, learn from someone else’s insights or wisdom. Why not keep an open mind when advice or critiques are offered?

tribe

tribe - noun any aggregate of people united by ties of descent from a common ancestor, community of customs and traditions, adherence to the same leaders, etc.

They came from the Seacoast (on the eastern border), Salem (on the southern border), and Winchester (on the western border). They came from the city (Manchester) and the country (Barnstead, Grafton). They came from all over New Hampshire, by way of states all over the U.S. (Maine, Washington, California, South Carolina, Kansas, Georgia). They came to help me move into my new home.

None of my blood relatives came to help me (in fact, none of them even did me the courtesy of acknowledging that I’d invited them to do so). None of my coworkers, some of whom I respect and enjoy, and some of whom live in the same town as me and told me they’d help me, actually showed up to do so. But every single New Hampshire Porcupine, to a person, who told me they’d come to help me, kept their word and did so. Several brought their children, and put them to work as well. Kids hauled my garbage, searched my house to find where my shell-shocked cats were hiding, and planted a shrub in my garden as a housewarming gift. Every single one of these people could have found a more enjoyable way to spend a beautiful warm Saturday (it was even the birthday of two of the kids (twins)).

These people are my tribe. I have a tribe! One and only one thing unites us, but that one thing is enough: the realization that we don’t need government. That, in fact, government usually/always (opinions differ on this point) does more harm than good. The government certainly didn’t help me move. It didn’t carry any furniture down my stairs. It didn’t come over, shake my hand, hand me a business card, and say “I live down the street. If you ever need anything, call me.” It didn’t rent me a truck (a private business did that). It didn’t provide me a modern-day place to “hunt and gather” enough “bananas” with which to buy a house (four entrepreneurs who founded and run my company did that). All it did was leave a nasty note on my car for I’m not sure what reason (parking too long on a public street by the U-Haul office?) warning me that if I didn’t move it soon, I’d get towed.

The actual move took very little time: about 45 minutes on the loading end, 30 minutes on the unloading end. The rest of the afternoon was spent eating, drinking, joking, gossiping and debating political philosophy. And when it comes right down to it, that’s what life is all about. There are certain timeless and universal truths. Babies are cute. Cats do funny things. Charred meat and beer taste good. People fall in, and out, of love. And we hairless apes still, after, what, 6 million years?, are arguing about how best to live together in relative peace without stealing each other’s bananas. And that’s OK! So maybe the occasional four-letter word was shouted (in front of the children, no less!). Each of us respects the others’ right to keep the bananas they’ve picked themselves.

For the first time in a long time, I have a sense of hope. I suddenly understand on a different level that it’s not about improving the government, or finding a way to coopt it, or take it over, or defeat it. It’s about learning to work with it, or around it, or flat-out IGNORING it. And in the meantime, we’re teaching our children, and earning our livings, and building our homes, and living our lives. Good, decent lives. With gossip. And beer.

Excuse me for quoting a politician, but it really is a good line: Government is not a solution to our problem, government is the problem. If you, like us, understand that… and also understand that there ain’t no such thing as a free lunch (aka TANSTAAFL), that you need to find an honest way to earn a living and put a roof over your head and bananas in your belly… then I invite you to join us here in New Hampshire. (But please, don’t come if you haven’t grasped both halves of that last sentence; we have ways of dealing with those types…)

Join the Free State Project now.

North American Secessionist Convention

On Saturday, Nov. 15, 2008, Manchester New Hampshire played host to the Third Annual North American Secessionist Convention. This event, organized and sponsored each year by the Middlebury Institute, brings together delegates of secessionist groups from throughout North America to exchange ideas, engage in networking, and promote the idea of secession to attendees and the general public. Attendance is free, and delegates are treated to a closing banquet, courtesy of the Middlebury Institute.

The convention was held at the Radisson Hotel in downtown Manchester. The inaugural event took place in Burlington, VT in 2006, and last year’s event was held in Chattanooga, TN. Kirkpatrick Sale, director of the Middlebury Institute and organizer of the annual event, makes a point of referring to it as a *convention*, not a conference, because its attendees are delegates of various organizations, just as the First and Second Constitutional Conventions of what would become the USA were attended by representatives of various states and territories. The Middlebury Institute focuses on the study of separatism, secession and self-determination.

The convention began promptly at 9:00AM with a presentation by Ku Kuakahi, delegate from the Kingdom of Hawaii. The KoH doesn’t seek to secede from the U.S., as the kingdom never voluntarily joined the U.S. in the first place, but rather was forcibly annexed in 1893. The KoH seeks to regain its independence, to be recognized as an independent nation by the global community of nation-states, and to reinstitute its traditional constitutional monarchy.

Kai Landau of the Hawaiian Embassy also spoke about the political situation in Hawaii. The Hawaiian Embassy pursues a strategy of running a shadow government in parallel with the existing U.S. government. It has its own Prime Minister and courts, and members have contested land ownership, attempting to restore land to its rightful owners from prior to annexation. Members have also challenged driver’s license regulations in court.

The next speaker, Larry Kilgore, ran for the U.S. Senate as a Texas Republican on an openly secessionist platform, garnering 19% of the vote in the party primary. This was a significant improvement over a prior run for governor of Texas, also on a secessionist platform, in which Kilgore claimed 9% of the vote. If elected, Kilgore will request permission from the federal government for Texas to peacefully secede from the Union. If the request is refused, Kilgore intends to rely on the international court of public opinion to further his cause; he opposes any use of violence. More information can be found at http://www.texassecession.com/

Keith Humphrey spoke on behalf of the organization Christian Exodus. Originally founded as a plan to encourage Christians to move to the state of South Carolina in order to build up a large enough number to have political clout, the group has since expanded its reach into Idaho and Panama. Approximately 1500 people have signed up so far, and dozens of families have already relocated. C.E. focuses on independence at the family level, promoting personal secession by “getting off the grid”, home-birthing and not registering newborns with the government, local agriculture, home businesses, and alternative currencies. There is no central organization; families that have relocated operate autonomously.

Next on the agenda was Cesidio Tallini, governor of Independent Long Island. ILI is made up of Queens, Nassau, Suffolk and King Counties in New York, as well as a small island in the Pacific. Brooklyn, NY is its capital. Founded in Aug. 2007, the independent nation currently has 16 registered citizens, to which it issues its own passports.

Tom Moore spoke on behalf of both the Southern National Congress and the League of the South. The LoS is a broadbased organization promoting southern independence and publishes its own newspaper, the Free Magnolia. Members of the LoS emphasize self-sufficiency and local food production.

The Southern National Congress, founded in 2004, serves as a forum for all southern states to express their grievances with the federal government; it’s modelled on the 1st and 2nd Continental Congresses. It promotes the concept of withholding consent. The SNC will be holding its first Congressional meeting Dec. 5 - 7, 2008 in Hendersonville, NC. 120 delegates from all thirteen southern states and Maryland are expected to attend. Moore discussed some successful historical precedents for peaceful secession from imperial control, including India, Ireland and Scotland.

The Alaskan Independence Party was represented by Dexter Clark, its Vice-Chair (Clark’s wife, Lynette, is party Chair). Clark issued a formal apology for unwittingly playing a role in the public furor that ensued when inaccurate stories of Republican Vice Presidential candidate Sarah Palin circulated in the recent Presidential campaign. Apparently, Clark had erroneously stated at a previous convention that Sarah Palin had been a member, and his speech was recorded and posted on YouTube. Political hacks then went so far as to create a false website, claiming to represent the AIP, and prominently featuring Sarah Palin on its homepage. Clark wished to set the record straight that Sarah Palin has never been a member of the AIP, although she has addressed the organization and her husband, Todd, was a member for seven years. Convention attendees were shown a recording of a CNN “expose” on the AIP, in which a reporter visited the Clarks at their home in Fairbanks and a political analyst commented on the party’s official platform and public statements. He proclaimed it “radical”, but “legitimate”.

The AIP is a state-level political party that runs candidates for office and promotes the idea of Alaskan independence with a minimal government. In the recent election, some AIP candidates received more than 4% of the vote, thus deciding the outcome of battles between the two major parties.

Thomas Naylor spoke on behalf of several secessionist organizations from the state of Vermont. Naylor has been involved with the Vermont secession movement for five years, and described it as a loose alliance of four separate organizations: the Second Vermont Republic, the Vermont Commons, Free Vermont and the Green Mountain Brigade. While one of the best organized secessionist movements in North America, 2VR has suffered from public attacks, some anonymous, falsely linking it to white supremacist organizations. Naylor refutes any such claims. The Vermont legislature reportedly contains several closet secessionists, but none who are willing to go public yet. 2VR held its second statewide convention earlier this month, in the Vermont State House of all places.

Dennis Steele spoke briefly on behalf of the Green Mountain Brigade. This self-described hardcore Ron Paul supporter is now encouraging Vermont residents to run for office on a secessionist platform. He also encouraged other convention delegates to come together and combine their efforts on behalf of one secessionist movement (namely, Vermont’s), in order to increase its chance of success. Just one success would serve as a catalyst for the rest of the nation.

For the first time, the Parti Quebecois sent a representative to the North American Secessionist Convention. Marcel Sauvais spoke at length about the history of the party, a political movement which developed in conjunction with a cultural rejection of Catholicism. Although the province of Quebec, with a population of 7.5 million and a land area equivalent to Scandinavia, was dominated by the Catholic Church throughout much of its history, the Parti Quebecois is a strictly secular movement. The party held its first referendum for independence in 1980, which failed in part due to the difficulty at that time of spreading countercultural and anti-federal government ideas. A second attempt in 1995 failed very narrowly; Sauvais believes there was vote fraud and that the legitimate result was that a majority of Quebecois voted to secede from Canada.

Robert Pritchard represented the Republic of Texas. Pritchard seeks to regain independence for the original Republic of Texas, whose territory included parts of what is now Oklahoma. The RoT promotes the use of cantons, as exist in Switzerland today, as well as a “virtual country” approach. There is no reason why government should have a territorial monopoly; residents should be free to choose among multiple governments. The RoT currently claims “a couple handful” of citizens.

Carolyn Chute spoke informally on behalf of the Second Maine Militia (not to be confused with the Maine Militia, a different organization), a loosely organized non-partisan group of pro-gun, anti-big business citizens. Chute, the author of several books, believes that politics grows out of culture. Maine has a unique culture that provides networking opportunities between different interest groups. There’s a very strong food sovereignty movement in the state.

The Free State Project was on the agenda (according to Mr. Sale, three participants had RSVP’ed to represent the organization), but none of those three were in attendance. As the FSP is a New Hampshire movement, there were several other participants in attendance (full disclosure: this reporter is also an FSP participant); Mr. Sale asked if any of them would like to say a few words on behalf of the organization. A man identifying himself only as “William” quickly accepted the offer. William talked about how the FSP is an effort to get 20,000 pro-liberty activists to move to New Hampshire, where they will exert the fullest practical effort toward the creation of a society in which the maximum role of government is the protection of life, liberty and property. According to the organization’s website, it currently has almost 9000 participants signed up, with over 600 already in New Hampshire. William discussed the diversity of strategies used by FSP participants, some working within the electoral system while others pursuing alternate avenues such as civil disobedience. In the recent election, several FSP participants were elected to the New Hampshire state house.

The last delegate of the day was Sebastian Ronin, speaking on behalf of the Novacadia Alliance, which is comprised of the Canadian Maritime Provinces (Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island) as well as the U.S. states of Maine, New Hampshire and Vermont. (Newfoundland is excluded.) Ronin is the former Executive Director of the BC Green Party and now resides in Nova Scotia. He believes that global industrial civilization is rapidly headed towards collapse due to Peak Oil, and that freedom-minded people should prepare themselves for massive cultural changes. The territory of Novacadia currently has a population of 5 million; its three largest cities are Halifax, Manchester and St. John. The Novacadia Independence Party is a brand-new political party that allows citizens of both Canada and the U.S. to join.

The second half of the one-day convention featured a workshop led by Dexter Clark, which presented specific tactics to use to promote the idea of secession. A last-minute addition to the agenda was a presentation by Robert Steele, a self-described “moderate Republican” with strong opinions but no apparent association with any secessionist organizations.

The convention wrapped up with a discussion of a joint resolution to be signed and issued by the delegates of the organizations in attendance. The end result, The Manchester Declaration can be viewed on the Middlebury Institute’s website.

a fable

The Fable of the Lake Monster

Once upon a time, in a far off land, there was a large and beautiful lake. It had a number of villages along its shore.

The lake was the source of everything the villagers needed. It provided water for drinking, cleaning and bathing; fish and shellfish to eat; mud and reeds from which to manufacture buildings, rope and cloth; it attracted wildlife which could be hunted for meat and leather.

There were many such lakes throughout the land, each with villages beside it whose inhabitants depended upon the lake for their basic necessities.

And every lake contained a monster.

The lake monsters varied in size, shape, color and level of aggressiveness, but they all had one common characteristic: they were sustained and nurtured by the villagers of their native lake.

The most common manner in which villagers cared for their monsters was to throw a certain percentage of their food catch into the lake on a regular basis. The monsters, being omnivorous, would greedily eat anything: fish, fruit, vegetables, poultry, venison, even stray cats. Occasionally, a monster would come out of the water and feed directly on its own villagers. Some people found this horrifying, but most were pragmatic and accepted it as a necessary aspect of life beside a lake. Most villagers actually felt a great deal of affection for their lake monster, taking pride in the belief that theirs was the biggest, strongest, most intelligent and fearsome of any lake monster to be found anywhere. Children were taught to love their monster, to sing songs about it and tell stories about when it was just a baby monster. There could be no greater sacrifice to one’s community than to actually be eaten by the monster.

Every village was ruled by a Council of Elders. Their job was to oversee the feeding of the monster. The Elders, or their assistants, would gather up all of the food donated by the villagers and drop it into the lake at regular intervals. Serving on the Council of Elders was considered highly prestigious. It took a lot of time, effort and paperwork to ensure that a monster’s nutritional needs were met, and to make sure that every villager was paying his fair share. The food donations were too important to be left to the discretion of the villagers; therefore, the Elders put uncooperative villagers in the stockade as a form of motivation.

Jo was a resident of a small village on the shore of Lake Rika. He was born there, and spent most of his life there. Within Lake Rica, there lived a particularly crafty monster called Sammy, which swam back and forth ceaselessly under the water. Its body was so huge, its mere passing could capsize small boats. Although primarily a water creature, Sammy had wings and, on occasion, sprang forth from Lake Rika and flew off to a village beside another lake to consume villagers. For some reason, Sammy seemed to find them tastier. Or perhaps he was intelligent enough to realize that, by eating another lake’s villagers while leaving his own alive to feed him, he could wind up with twice as much to eat.

For a time in his childhood, due to poor local fishing conditions, Jo and his family had gone to live in a village on the shore of a distant lake very far away. There were numerous lakes between the two which it had been necessary for Jo’s family to rest at while making the journey. Jo had thus learned at a young age that Lake Rika was not the only lake in the world; and that Sammy was not the only lake monster. But Lake Rika was still the largest and most beautiful, and Sammy the most awe-inspiring of monsters.

As a child, Jo loved Sammy, just as the other children did. He looked forward to the annual celebration of Sammy’s birthday, when the whole village was festooned with lights and images of lake monsters (to be honest, no one was entirely certain the exact date of the monster’s birth, but the event was generally accepted to have occurred mid-summer and was celebrated at that time). He hoped that when he grew up, he could be one of the ones to be eaten; that would certainly make his parents very proud.

As an adult, Jo became an accomplished fisherman, and made a good living fishing on the lake and selling his catch in the village. Over a period of years, he earned the money to build his own fishing boat, as his parents had done before him, and his parents had done before *them*. He dutifully turned over the exact number of fishes that the Council of Elders dictated was necessary to sate Sammy’s appetite each month. He knew that everyone had to pay their share, and that Sammy was magnificent and would always protect the village from harm.

As he got a bit older, Jo began to become aware of things in the village that he had overlooked before. It wasn’t exactly true that everyone paid their share to feed Sammy; some people did, but some didn’t. Not only that, but the Council of Elders was actually taking some of the food that was collected from villagers like Jo and, instead of giving it to Sammy, was giving it to other villagers instead. This didn’t seem quite fair to Jo. Some of the recipients of donated monster food seemed truly needy through no fault of their own, but others appeared to simply be personal friends or family members of the Elders. A large number of them, it was difficult to tell how or why they were needy. The village was quite large; no one villager personally knew everyone who lived there. Jo certainly didn’t have time to get to know them all; he was too busy fishing. But still, he had a pretty good life, despite the “voluntary” lake monster feeding regulations; he ate well, was in good health, had a sturdy fishing boat… why rock it?

Sammy’s feeding forays to distant lakes became more frequent (or maybe Jo just started noticing them more than he had when he was younger). It started to really get to him. He thought of the mothers and fathers who lived on the shores of other lakes and how they must feel when Sammy ate their children. It seemed very wrong. The Council of Elders praised Sammy for his feeding frenzies, saying that he was doing the distant villagers a favor by ridding them of excess children and that they’d thank the people of Lake Rika for it once they had calmed down a bit. Jo seriously doubted this was true.

Jo knew what had to be done; the Council of Elders needed to be reformed! They were the ones who decided how much food was given to Sammy; how much of each type of food needed to be donated by different village producers (X fish, Y oranges, Z venison steaks). They were also the ones who decided which villagers got to take some of the monster haul and eat it, rather than making a donation themselves. If Jo could only get the *right* villagers appointed to the Council, then the collection and distribution of monster fodder would finally be handled in a logical and fair manner.

After a few years of working with like-minded villagers trying to get the right people on the Council of Elders, Jo started to question the efficacy of his plan. For one thing, the Council of Elders in his village was only one of many; it didn’t have much control, ultimately, over how much Sammy got fed, since every village had its own Council, and every Council was feeding the monster. For another, the Council of Elders had a monopoly on village policy, and could therefore change the rules at will if it looked like Jo actually had a decent shot at getting appointed to the Council or convincing a seated Elder to make any sort of sensible change in Sammy’s dietary planning. Meanwhile, the times when Sammy rose out of the water to feed were very unsettling, and were causing more and more ill will between the peoples of Lake Rika and the peoples of other lakes (the ones Sammy kept eating). The Council of Elders of Sammy’s village had no control over this at all. It all seemed like a bit of a fool’s quest.

More years went by, and Jo became acquainted with a very small group of radical villagers who proposed a quite shocking idea: Sammy was not magnificent. In fact, Sammy was a terrible drain on the energy of the village and its inhabitants. He ate an increasingly large portion of the food; his care absorbed the time and energy of some of the best minds in the village, people who might otherwise have been devising innovative new ways to catch fish, or teach the children, or design more energy-efficient mud huts. A very few villagers said that there was something inherently *wrong* with people feeding a monster. Villagers don’t need a Council of Elders. Monsters don’t deserve to be fed.

Jo had trouble swallowing this. Living without a lake monster was not an option, was it? All villagers needed a lake monster, just as every lake monster needed villagers. To question this was the most unspeakable of heresies. And besides, Sammy wasn’t nearly as bad as a lot of other monsters Jo had heard about. Some monsters were truly cancerous, eating such a large percentage of their villagers’ food that the villagers themselves starved to death as a result… or eating so many of the children that villages lost entire generations of citizens, with almost no one left to keep the gardens growing, the fish nets filled, and to take care of the elderly. Surely his own Council of Elders was doing good and necessary work; without them, how would Sammy get fed? If anything were to happen to Sammy, perhaps an even worse monster would move into the lake to take his place.

After months of thinking about this, Jo came to the realization that it was true: villagers *didn’t* need a Council of Elders. Feeding a monster did not make sense. Gaining control of the Council of Elders, which was appearing increasingly unlikely as it was, wouldn’t solve the ultimate problem: what to do about Lake Rika’s man-eating lake monster.

The anti-Council villagers tried to spread their ideas by making colorful signs and banners. They wrote new anti-monster songs and stories, and talked to everyone they came into contact with about their radical ideas. It was a very hard sell; the vast majority of villagers had been taught from earliest childhood that lake monsters were a necessary part of life, and that Sammy was a particularly benevolent lake monster.

A handful of anti-Council villagers tried innovative methods of getting their message across. Some threw rocks at the monster. A few of them charged full-speed ahead directly into Sammy’s open mouth and hung out in his belly, for days or even weeks. (As long as Sammy didn’t chew them, this didn’t seem to harm them.) However, it was not very comfortable or interesting sitting in a lake monster’s gut (not to mention the stench…). But these villagers seemed confident that this would help to demonstrate to people that Sammy was not a net positive for the village. Jo had his doubts about the efficacy of this plan, too; if villagers were unfazed by having their *own children* eaten by a lake monster, he didn’t think that seeing a few strangers jump into the monster’s mouth was going to help much. It certainly didn’t hurt Sammy any, and it really seemed to annoy the Council of Elders, as well as some of those who were attempting to take control of it in order to reduce the monster’s diet.

Jo’s head was so preoccupied from thinking about all of this, he was having trouble focusing on his fishing. Sometimes it just seemed easier to hang out in the corner pub, drinking ale until closing time, to blot it all out. He knew that he not only needed to catch enough fish to feed himself and his family, and to pay his share of the monster’s feed (which he only paid at this point to keep himself out of the village stockade), he also needed to make sure he had enough fish left over to trade for dried oranges and venison to get through the winter when the edges of the lake froze over, which would make fishing impossible.

There were disturbing signs of a coming shortage of fish, and of the reeds from which fishing nets were woven. Jo wasn’t sure how he would manage if he became unable to fish. He did have a small garden, and was brushing up on his deer hunting skills, but still, it wouldn’t be enough if the fish stopped biting. There were credible rumors that the Council of Elders, as well as the Grand Council located in the swamp down at the foot of the lake, were making plans to increase the monster food ration by a lot. Jo knew that if things got really bad, and there were a large number of needy villagers screaming to the Council that they needed more fish to eat, the Council would simply take whatever Jo had managed to put away for the winter in order to redistribute it (unless he managed to hide it somehow). They might even take his boat, making it impossible for him to catch any more fish. He didn’t even want to think about the “Peak Fish” theory some villagers were talking about.

Jo spent some time researching lakes other than Lake Rika, wondering if there were any without monsters (or at least with very small, weak ones that didn’t eat much). It didn’t look too promising, though. Almost all charted lakes had monsters, and the villages on the shores of the few that didn’t were highly selective about letting new villagers move in. Jo couldn’t really blame them! Not only that, but the Council of Elders of his own village had contacts throughout the land, and found ways to enforce the voluntary donation of lake monster rations by all citizens of Lake Rika, even if they no longer lived on the shores of that lake.

It seemed to Jo that there were a limited number of options for a hard-working villager who’d had the lake monster scales removed from his eyes:

1) accept the status quo, keep feeding the lake monster, keep his head down and his eyes on his boat, and pray that the fish kept biting

2) continue trying to gain control of the Council of Elders, and if successful, thereby have some small say in the makeup of Sammy’s diet

3) stop contributing to the monster’s rations, and see how long it took the Elders to throw him in the stockade, take his fishing boat and all of his winter savings

4) find a way to convince a great number of other villagers that it’s not right to feed a monster and get them to stop. It wouldn’t take much of a reduction in Sammy’s food tribute for him to feel it. He would undoubtedly get angry… very angry. The Council of Elders would feel threatened. What would happen then, Jo couldn’t even imagine.

Jo took his boat out on the lake, with the nets pulled in, just to get away from the village and think about it all.

to be continued…..

someday at christmas

Stevie said it better than I ever could.

Someday at Christmas

Someday at Christmas men won’t be boys
Playing with bombs like kids play with toys
One warm December our hearts will see
A world where men are free

Someday at Christmas there’ll be no wars
When we have learned what Christmas is for
When we have found what life’s really worth
There’ll be peace on earth

Someday all our dreams will come to be
Someday in a world where men are free
Maybe not in time for you and me
But someday at Christmastime

Someday at Christmas we’ll see a Man
No hungry children, no empty hand
One happy morning people will share
Our world where people care

Someday at Christmas there’ll be no tears
All men are equal and no men have fears
One shining moment my heart ran away
From our world today

Someday all our dreams will come to be
Someday in a world where men are free
Maybe not in time for you and me
But someday at Christmastime

Someday at Christmas man will not fail
Take hope because your love will prevail
Someday a new world that we can start
With hope in every heart

Someday all our dreams will come to be
Someday in a world where men are free
Maybe not in time for you and me
But someday at Christmastime
Someday at Christmastime

Warmest holiday wishes to you and your’n, from up here in New Hampshire Free State. :-)

v for vendetta

Good evening, New Hampshire.

Allow me first to apologize for this interruption. I do, like many of you, appreciate the comforts of the everyday routine, the security of the familiar, the tranquility of repetition. I enjoy them as much as any bloke. But in the spirit of commemoration whereby those important events of the past, usually associated with someone’s death or the end of some awful, bloody struggle, a celebration with a nice holiday, I thought we could take some time out of our daily lives to sit down and have a little chat. There are of course those who do not want us to speak. I expect even now orders are being shouted into telephones and men with guns will soon be on their way. Why? Because while the truncheon may be used in lieu of conversation, words will always retain their power. Words offer the means to meaning, and for those who will listen, the enunciation of truth. And the truth is, there is something terribly wrong with this country, isn’t there? Cruelty and injustice, intolerance and oppression, and where once you had the freedom to object, to think and speak as you saw fit, you now have censors and systems of surveillance coercing your conformity and soliciting your submission. How did this happen? Who’s to blame? Well certainly there are those who are more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable. But again, truth be told, if you’re looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror. I know why you did it. I know you were afraid! Who wouldn’t be? War, terror, disease, there were a myriad of problems which conspired to induce us to silently acquiesce as our elected representatives moved swiftly to expand their power in grossly unconstitutional ways in the immediate aftermath of Sept. 11, 2001. The 11th of September burns forever in our memory, but the 26th of October, the day the USA PATRIOT Act was signed into law, is sadly forgotten. It is left to us to remind the world that fairness, justice and freedom are more than words… they are perspectives. So if you’ve seen nothing, if the crimes of this government remain unknown to you, then I would suggest that you allow the 26th of October to pass unmarked. But if you see what I see, if you feel as I feel, and if you would seek as I seek, then I ask you to stand beside me two months from today, at noon, on the steps of the New Hampshire state capitol, and together we shall give them a 26th of October that shall never, ever be forgot.

random acts of YouTube

‘Tis a brave new world.  I was just checking out the President’s Corner, a sorta-monthly video newsletter presented by Varrin Swearingen, President of the Free State Project, when I noticed a familiar face in a little video montage menu… MINE.  Apparently I was filmed the entire time I was speaking at the first annual Secession Conference in Burlington, VT last November (see my blog entries on this event here and here).  Someone spliced together all my remarks (some of which were answers to questions posed by other conference attendees) and YouTubed them (can I use YouTube as a verb?).  Whoever said the revolution will not be televised clearly didn’t have broadband Internet access.  So once again, live! from Secession Central, it’s… ME!

Next Page »